February 2, 2006:
Day one began with an opening statement by both the Company and the Union.
Each party laid out their concerns and the hopes for meaningful dialog by
which we can come to a mutually beneficial agreement.
The Company stated it was satisfied with
the long standing working relationship it has developed over the years
with the Union. The Union expressed the
concerns of the bargaining unit regarding issues that have arisen due to
hurricanes, hail storms, and unforeseen situations that have impacted on
the membership family’s income.
The Union submitted its non-economic
proposal to the Company for study and comment. During the first day, one
issue was tentatively agreed to. The Company was represented by Mr. Len
Rehm, Labor Relations Manager, and Ms. Susan Garrison, TH-57 Business
Manager. Your Union Negotiating Committee was represented by all Committee
members as listed below.
After both parties met, from 0800 to 1630,
the Negotiating Committee remained in the Board Room to work on counter
proposals to the Company’s two pages of proposals and counter proposals
received by the Union on this day. Your committee
tirelessly worked until 2330 at the Hampton Inn before going home for a
few hours of sleep.
February 3, 2006:
Day two started off at 1000 at the
negotiations table, with the disappointing news that Ms. Garrison was
unable to attend today’s negotiation session due to an illness. We pray
that she recovers soon. Ms. Garrison was replaced by Mr. David Carrington,
as the local representative for the Company for further discussion of our
issues and listening to the Union’s justification of our
positions.
The Union presented several counter
proposals that had been drafted the night before and between 0800 and
1000, prior to meeting with the Company.
The Union was attentive to the Company’s
positions and justifications. The Committee members were given an
opportunity to relay the membership’s issues and reinforce the Business
Representatives’ words presented across the table in our behalf. The open
dialogue, hopefully, will help resolve some of the issues to progress the
Union’s efforts to develop a package that addresses the membership’s
concerns.
After the Company concluded the days
negotiations at approximately 1430, the Committee continued to work and
consider avenues that were “within reasonable agreement” for further
counter proposals.
Unfortunately, the Company’s Labor
Relations Managers will not be available to meet with your Negotiating
Committee again until March 9, 2006. We have tentatively agreed to meet
from March 9, 2006, to the midnight hour of March 17, 2006, if necessary,
to get a package to take back to the membership for consideration.
Very little movement has been seen from the
Company regarding the Union’s proposals. Of course, the Company’s stated
position is that the Union has taken few concessions toward the Company’s
proposals or language that is necessary for their continued operations of
the facilities. The day concluded early and the Committee continued the
use of the conference room in an attempt to counter the Company’s stand to
keep issues “status quo.”
As we continue the process, we need to
ensure that the Company is aware your elected representatives at the table
are speaking in your behalf. Your solidarity on the shop floor, work
spaces, and flight line will help us all succeed in obtaining a contract
that addresses our issues which you indicated were the most
important to you in your survey you recently completed.
As always, we remind all workers to follow
all Company instructions, work rules, maintenance instructions and be
vigilant of all safety rules. We have proven our skills, knowledge and
experience to the United States Navy for several years now and must not
let up; now or ever. We are dedicated to providing the safest training
aircraft for the military that can be provided.
We surveyed the membership and have listed
your issues in your contract proposals. Your support of our efforts to
obtain your designated goals will only be realized by your voluntary show
of support of your Negotiating Committee. Your Union Negotiating Committee
is committed to promoting the interest of the membership. We are united in
this endeavor. We appreciate the show of support and encourage you to pray
for the best and prepare for the worse.
In Solidarity,
Your
TH-57 Contract Negotiation Committee
Tony Howard,
TH-57 Committee
Chairman
Lou Paroby,
TH-57 Committeeman
Rich Hartley,
TH-57 Committeeman
Danny Givens,
IAMAW District Lodge
75 Business Rep